I was asked the question whether I was still a non-theist?
You said, quite rightly I think, that
 my understanding is somewhat Taoist. Naming the nameless is to damage 
and limit: it is also an arrogance. Being open to the profoundness of 
what is - to the naked force of being - and knowing that you cannot know
 - that is fundamental. Imagining that we can have a transactional 
relationship with the totality of being is delusional: reality is 
remorseless. In the preciousness and precariousness of life we find the 
divine light. The spark that ignites the transmutation of the inert into
 the vital: the promethean fire that burns through us all. Minding, 
nurturing and guarding that light, both in ourselves and in others, is 
the function of religion.
